Search found 1840 matches

by ChillyPhilly
Fri Jan 22, 2021 2:40 pm
Forum: CBD Development
Topic: [SWP] SAHMRI Stage 2
Replies: 171
Views: 77173

[SWP] Re: SAHMRI Stage 2

SAHMRI 2 is done!

Image
by ChillyPhilly
Thu Jan 21, 2021 5:13 pm
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: [PRO] Hove Level Crossing Removal | $171m
Replies: 77
Views: 19393

[PRO] Re: Hove Level Crossing Removal | $171m

Interested in hearing more about the Hove Level Crossing Removal Project? Come along to a community information session and meet members of the project team, ask questions, and get an update on the project. We’re holding sessions at Brighton Football Club (410 Brighton Road, Hove) on the following d...
by ChillyPhilly
Mon Jan 18, 2021 11:03 am
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: Adelaide Hills Truck bypass
Replies: 1
Views: 213

Re: Adelaide Hills Truck bypass

You can find the ideas in here: https://dpti.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/625951/GlobeLink_Scoping_Study_Report_Business_Case.pdf It's known as 'Short North'. Many members of this forum believe in a tunnel under Cross Road, directly connecting the South-Eastern Freeway to the North-South Mo...
by ChillyPhilly
Sat Jan 16, 2021 7:49 am
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: [PRO] Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m
Replies: 140
Views: 31045

[PRO] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

They were slow, noisy and inefficient.

The State Government did enquire about cutting off the high cab at one point.
by ChillyPhilly
Sat Jan 16, 2021 7:47 am
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains
Replies: 4778
Views: 920314

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

It does make sense but the Hendon line went in a different direction.

Urban planning failed hardcore in most places in the world in the 60s and 70s.
by ChillyPhilly
Fri Jan 15, 2021 6:12 pm
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: [PRO] Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m
Replies: 140
Views: 31045

[PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

To be honest, with the amount of infill occurring in this area, Ovingham, Dudley Park and Islington should all get a makeover. Compared to the Seaford line, the Gawler line has seriously been neglected. I've thought this every single time I've been past these stations. They're all very under par. M...
by ChillyPhilly
Fri Jan 15, 2021 2:49 pm
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: [PRO] Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m
Replies: 140
Views: 31045

[PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

Pistol wrote:To be honest, with the amount of infill occurring in this area, Ovingham, Dudley Park and Islington should all get a makeover.

Compared to the Seaford line, the Gawler line has seriously been neglected.
I've thought this every single time I've been past these stations. They're all very under par.
by ChillyPhilly
Fri Jan 15, 2021 2:18 pm
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: [PRO] Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m
Replies: 140
Views: 31045

[PRO] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

You can leave your feedback to include an upgrade of Ovingham Railway Station here: https://www.dit.sa.gov.au/infrastructure/public_transport_projects/ovingham_level_crossing_removal/feedback_and_suggestions Here's what I said: This project is decades overdue and will no doubt deliver benefits for t...
by ChillyPhilly
Fri Jan 15, 2021 2:08 pm
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: [U/C] M2 North-South Motorway
Replies: 5045
Views: 957028

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

Labor's Scoping Report is the closest we've come to something of moderate detail.
by ChillyPhilly
Wed Jan 13, 2021 3:56 pm
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains
Replies: 4778
Views: 920314

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

Article about the ARS refresh. Entrances getting an overhaul.

https://renewalsa.sa.gov.au/news/a-new- ... ain-goers/
by ChillyPhilly
Tue Jan 12, 2021 9:36 pm
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: [PRO] Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m
Replies: 140
Views: 31045

[PRO] Re: [PRO] Re: Ovingham Level Crossing Removal | $231m

Hooligan wrote:Silly question, but does the overpass need to be high enough to allow double stacking on the freight line?
Double stacking is loaded/unloaded at Kilburn.
by ChillyPhilly
Tue Jan 12, 2021 9:34 pm
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: [U/C] M2 North-South Motorway
Replies: 5045
Views: 957028

[U/C] Re: M2 North-South Motorway

We all know that Torrens to Darlington is going to be an election issue.
by ChillyPhilly
Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:54 pm
Forum: Metropolitan Development
Topic: [APP] Coles Norwood Redevelopment | 8 Lvls
Replies: 73
Views: 45228

[APP] Re: Coles Norwood Redevelopment | 8 Lvls

Coles will close on 10 February.
by ChillyPhilly
Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:27 pm
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: News & Discussion: Roads & Traffic
Replies: 1315
Views: 248081

Re: News & Discussion: Roads & Traffic

Property acquisitions in major intersection upgrade The Transport Department is embarking on a $35 million upgrade of the intersection of Glen Osmond and Fullarton roads, with a spokesperson telling InDaily two commercial properties are expected to be fully acquired, while up to another 18 will hav...
by ChillyPhilly
Sun Jan 10, 2021 1:45 pm
Forum: Infrastructure/Transport Development
Topic: News & Discussion: Roads & Traffic
Replies: 1315
Views: 248081

Re: News & Discussion: Roads & Traffic

Modbury Freeway similar to MATS would be a massive environmental disaster. At best, significant improvements to NE Road should be considered - a permanent express bus lane, accessible footbridges over the road and grade separations at key intersections would be sufficient. Unfortunately due to the n...